Well this is reasonably interesting – especially the language used.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
I read that David Cameron – our Public Schoolboy educated prime minister – also has recently stated that there should be no form of communication that the government should NOT be able to read.<\/p>\n
Now I know the argument that “If you have got nothing to hide – then you should have nothing to fear” – but how about my love sick longing for the girl next door? How about me expressing my most private fears or doubts or imaginings to my best friend?<\/p>\n
I have a feeling this reaches into the areas of shame. There is a healthy shame and an unhealthy one. If I am Embarrassed – it is because I am walking around with a “bare-ass” -and this is a healthy shame. But if I am shamed for who or what I am – then this is not healthy.<\/p>\n
Because the next question I have to ask is – OK – but can I trust the government to always have my best interests at heart? And, I am sorry to say, I cannot say this.<\/p>\n
So NO I do not think the government should be able, under its own cognisance, to read all my communications. I think it should have to get – at a minimum – a court order with full disclosure of the reason and the proof or evidence that they have as to why I am “a person of interest”-<\/p>\n
Nuff said.<\/p>\n
Bruce<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
US government gives finger to FOIA Snowden request –\u00a0Best VPN.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Well this is reasonably interesting – especially the language used. I read that David Cameron – our Public Schoolboy educated prime minister – also has recently stated that there should be no form of communication that the government should … Continue reading